Councillors in Brighton and Hove are to consider whether Preston Park can be given over to Brighton Pride for two weekends from 2025. This would mean that the public would be denied access to the park for around 18 days (allowing for the setting up and clearing up the site). The purpose is to make the Pride weekend itself more financially viable.
I asked on various social media platforms whether commercial considerations should outweigh people’s access to the Park?
Many people from throughout the city responded with comments like “No’ and “Too long”. Others have called for consultation with the local community. Here is a selection of other comments:
I’m not anti Pride, just think it’s got so big now it needs a bigger space. Plus the park is used by hundreds of people on the weekend for sports and dog walking – PB Preston Village
It is not just access to park that is lost. Residents could not go out or get home. Carers could not access the people they were to offer care to in the 15 min time slots carers have if having to park at Bowls club and walk. And it took an hour for a pride worker to come to guide cars in and out. – GH Preston Village
Having one of our city’s largest parks essentially privatised for three weeks is a terrible idea. Surely if the event has become this big a more suitable venue should be found that can accommodate it. – DC Hove Station
Consulting the local residents and park users really needs to happen here. … Also needs a bigger space than Preston Park so they do not shut the whole park just half a park. GH Preston Village
I thought Pride was about diversity and inclusiveness. A two-weekend gig will cause us locals to have to change our lifestyle and cause a big strain on our amenities and already dysfunctional public transport. Waterhall with dedicated travel solutions makes more sense to me. – AG Old Patcham
The park is for the use of the public which is maintained through local taxes so no this as a commercial venture should not be allowed – SM Whitehawk
… Why allow more? Also, damage to the park will increase. There is already damage to the grass – but if items are set up and not moved for another week (which is the aim to share set up costs) then the grass will be further damaged. Yes, it can be repaired but this increases the time that the park isn’t available to everyone – NH Hollingdean
I think one weekend for Pride is ok but two is excessive the park is used year round by lots of local society events tbh it’s only really the Saturday that’s a great success Sunday is never well attended ,it also makes it hard for residents to get in or out of Preston Park avenue. – JD Preston Park
As a local and long-time regular attendee at Pride, I have to say I agree this would be an unreasonable addititional burden on both the Park itself and on the area’s residents if this is indeed being considered. Frankly, you can have too much of even the greatest things. It’s important gay people give the same respect to others as we hope to receive ourselves. I know of several friends that have stopped attending because the hotels etc. charge premium prices over Pride, they’re not going to want to pay even more for a second weekend. – PB Hollingdean
Put simply: NO. It’s a public park managed by the City Council. -JM Hove Station … I would ask if the council had changed its designation from a public park to a ‘to hire commercial space’. The park is well used by many people for many reasons that in itself should outweigh a commercial venture which charges for entry. I have no problem with pride but as it’s grown out of all early imagination in size and logistics … – JM Hove Station
According to the Friends of Preston Park, the original bye-laws in 1884 prohibited, among other things, “selling alcohol, preaching, setting up a stall or playing games except in the designated spaces” https://www.friendsofprestonpark.org/history/. Make of that what you will. – TL London Road
I do feel for the residents that live by PP in my opinion it’s gone from being really a great weekend to dirty n horrible and for two weeks ouch – L-AK Hove Station
As a 40 year + resident of Preston Park I have seen Pride develop from a small well mannered event to a “monster” that disrupts residents lives makes our use of available “Green” space severely restricted and now is complaining it can’t balance its books.
If they are going to demand effectively a 20 day no go zone for Preston Park residents, what compensation are they going to offer ?20 day refund of community charge ? 20 day refund of Parking permit fees ? Compensate for disruption and inconvenience to residents lives !. You can bet your life that the won’t compensate one iota… – DP Preston Village
No! It’s a nightmare to get in or out of the city during Pride. It’s no longer a diverse celebration but a massive rubbish tip afterwards and vile homophobic drunkeness. Frankly, if the clowncil intend to go ahead with this money spinner there should be a visible public campaign to canvass those of us who live here and have to put up with it all. Before the zealots jump on my comments I’m labelled as part of the LGBTQ etc community although frankly, I don’t need a club or community to understand myself! – ST Coombe Road
No Thank You. Pride is all about spicy straights and furries now. Lesbians, Bisexuals and Gay men made to feel unwelcome if we don’t subscribe to the Gender Ideology promoted by Stonewall. AMcB Montpelier/Clifton Hill
It appears that our spaces are being taken over by events which is a shame particularly if this event is over such a long period – JJ Kemp Town
I live just a few hundred yards from St James’ Street and, although not really interested myself, always hope that the two or three days of the Pride street party go well, which, of course, they, by and large, do. Pride ‘weekend’ is an irritation to me in only one way: I am expected to pay to pass through or use the main shopping thoroughfare nearest my home, to visit a chemist for medicines, or to use a supermarket or shop (all of which which, in turn, seem to exist for those three days solely to supply snacks and alcohol to party participants?). I can, thankfully, live with that for a few days However, Preston Park? For eighteen days (or, in one scenario, twenty-one days)? That is a very different matter. The largest park in the city? A beautiful key, a welcoming entrance? Closed to the public for the best part of three weeks – a twentieth of the year? Purely to “ensure” a profit to a profit making enterprise? That is several steps too far. Our parks were gifted to the city as areas that provide attractive, healthy, open spaces to the city’s residents, green spaces for recreation, for calm in a busy, noisy, environment, for the good physical and mental health of all residents and visitors. Please note, gifted “for the city’s residents”, not just a select element of those residents, even if it is only for (a large) part of the year! – M F MacR-W